Vortex
Launch coin

Launching a coin

One transaction. It deploys the coin, opens its pool, seeds it with the whole float, and records the launch. If any part fails, none of it happened.

What you choose

what it isbounds
name / symbolthe usual1–64 and 1–16 characters
pair assetwhat your coin trades againstanything that clears the gate — see Pair assets
supplyfixed forever, no mint function exists1 to 1,000,000,000,000 coins
opening valuationwhere the price starts, denominated in the pair assetany
trading feecharged on every trade0.01% to 3%
tick spacinggranularity of the price range1 to 1,000
creator premineshare of supply you keep0 by default, hard-capped at 20%
fee routingwhat happens to your share — see Feeskeep, or buy back and burn
saltpicks your coin's addressmined off-chain

The launch fee is 0.0006 ETH, roughly a dollar and a half, and it is capped at 1 ETH in the contract so it can never quietly become a tax.

The one that trips people up

The opening valuation is denominated in the pair asset, not in dollars. Typing 1000 means a thousand AERO against AERO — about $600 — and a thousand WETH against WETH, about $2.5 million. Four orders of magnitude apart for the same number in the same box.

The SDK exists so you never have to think about this: startFdvInQuote takes a figure in pair-asset units and sdk/src/range.ts converts it into ticks, including the correction for pair assets that do not have 18 decimals — cbXRP has 6, NVDAc has 8. Get that correction wrong by hand and the launch opens twelve orders of magnitude off.

A Foundry test pins the SDK's arithmetic against the price a real pool actually opens at, so the two cannot drift apart.

Why you mine a salt

PairToken takes no constructor arguments, so its init code hash is constant and its address is a pure function of the salt. That matters because a concentrated-liquidity pool prices currency1 in terms of currency0, and which of those your coin becomes is decided purely by whether its address sorts above or below the pair asset's.

your coin isprice reads asbuying moves the tick
currency0pair asset per coinup
currency1coin per pair assetdown

Both work, and the contract handles both. But charts, screeners and human intuition all expect the first, so the SDK mines a salt that lands you there. It costs nothing but a few eth_calls.

What can go wrong

revertwhat happened
QuoteNotEligiblethe pair asset does not clear the depth bar — the error carries the reason code
QuoteDeniedthe pair asset is on the deny list
PoolAlreadyInitializedsomebody opened and priced your coin's pool first
TicksNotAlignedyour range is not a multiple of the tick spacing
InsufficientLaunchFeeyou sent less than the launch fee
CreatorShareTooHighpremine above 20%

PoolAlreadyInitialized is the interesting one. Your coin's address is predictable from your salt, so a griefer can open its pool first and price it wrong. The launch reverts cleanly, you pick another salt, and you have lost nothing but gas. Cheap to attack, cheaper to defend, never a loss of funds.